Smart Orders

Use this forum for questions and answers regarding PostGreSQL and the PGDBE.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
rdonnay
Site Admin
Posts: 4774
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho USA
Contact:

Smart Orders

#1 Post by rdonnay »

I have questions about ISAM Orders. This is from the Alaska documentation:

ISAM Orders: These orders maintain 100% backward compatibility with traditional ISAM indexes, utilizing a special order column to represent the synthetic key value of ISAM indexes. This ensures that even user-defined functions in index expressions and complex FOR conditions work correctly.

Has anyone used this capability to incorporate legacy CDX indexes with UDF's?

What is everyone's experience with Alaska Software's support forum?
I stopped trying to get online support from Alaska years ago because nobody used their newsgroup, but the PGDBE in ISAM mode may require more support than seems to be available in the documentation.
The eXpress train is coming - and it has more cars.

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Smart Orders

#2 Post by Tom »

Has anyone used this capability to incorporate legacy CDX indexes with UDF's?
We removed all UDFs from index expressions when we started with ADS a loooooong time ago (it began in Boise, Idaho - do you remember?). We did exactly that: Where needed, we created fields containing the result of the index expression and created the indexes on those fields.
So, we don't use this capability for UDFs, but I assume it's almost the same with all Xbase++-functions which are not supported by PostGres (and were supported by the ADS).
Best regards,
Tom

"Did I offend you?"
"No."
"Okay, give me a second chance."

k-insis
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Smart Orders

#3 Post by k-insis »

newsgroup @alaska was left to its own decade ago; at some times they did not even knew that it was down for weeks at time ...
And there is hardly anything about pgdbe on old newsgroup, while "ILX" forum is open only to paying customers apart from 'q&a' section.

This is what Pirsig wrote about topic in 2021:

"How to make your complex SET FILTER expression work on the PostgreSQL server"

https://ilx.alaska-software.com/index.p ... server.34/

So I guess a set of stored procedures on side of postgresql is needed to exactly replicate existing local functions.

And there is also this: - class pgremote filter too:

https://doc.alaska-software.com/content ... filter.cxp

Does install of xbase compiler come with help20\pg20.chm file ?


rdonnay wrote: Mon Oct 14, 2024 1:18 pm I have questions about ISAM Orders. This is from the Alaska documentation:

ISAM Orders: These orders maintain 100% backward compatibility with traditional ISAM indexes, utilizing a special order column to represent the synthetic key value of ISAM indexes. This ensures that even user-defined functions in index expressions and complex FOR conditions work correctly.

Has anyone used this capability to incorporate legacy CDX indexes with UDF's?

What is everyone's experience with Alaska Software's support forum?
I stopped trying to get online support from Alaska years ago because nobody used their newsgroup, but the PGDBE in ISAM mode may require more support than seems to be available in the documentation.

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Smart Orders

#4 Post by Tom »

So I guess a set of stored procedures on side of postgresql is needed to exactly replicate existing local functions.
No.
Best regards,
Tom

"Did I offend you?"
"No."
"Okay, give me a second chance."

User avatar
rdonnay
Site Admin
Posts: 4774
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho USA
Contact:

Re: Smart Orders

#5 Post by rdonnay »

So I guess a set of stored procedures on side of postgresql is needed to exactly replicate existing local functions.
I think that I have already come to that same conclusion after testing performance of ISAM mode with UDF's in indexes.

There is legacy code in the customer's application that is highly dependent on these UDF indexes, therefore some routines will most likely need to be replaced with SQL Select statements and Order By <stored procedure>. I only acquired their source code this morning, so I will need to examine how these indexes are used before I make that decision. Regardless, I will be learning the language of stored procedures now.
The eXpress train is coming - and it has more cars.

Post Reply