Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

Xbase++ 2.0 Build 554 or later
Message
Author
Wolfgang Ciriack
Posts: 481
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: Berlin Germany

Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#1 Post by Wolfgang Ciriack »

With version 2.00.1689 all gui dialogs are opening 2 - 4.5 times faster ! :clap:
_______________________
Best Regards
Wolfgang

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#2 Post by Tom »

I can confirm this. And it's stable.
Best regards,
Tom

"Did I offend you?"
"No."
"Okay, give me a second chance."

skiman
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:22 am
Location: Sijsele, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#3 Post by skiman »

Hi,

Seems as this is the solution for Windows 11.
Best regards,

Chris.
www.aboservice.be

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#4 Post by Tom »

Seems as this is the solution for Windows 11.
Not only that. The speed improvements effect all operating systems. It's even two, three times faster as an app build with 1.9SL1 on a Windows 10 machine.
Best regards,
Tom

"Did I offend you?"
"No."
"Okay, give me a second chance."

User avatar
rdonnay
Site Admin
Posts: 4775
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 6:58 pm
Location: Boise, Idaho USA
Contact:

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#5 Post by rdonnay »

Yes, it seems to be very stable.
No problems here.
The eXpress train is coming - and it has more cars.

User avatar
Auge_Ohr
Posts: 1422
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#6 Post by Auge_Ohr »

hi,

which "Base Priority" does Build 1689 show in Taskmanager -> Details -> Basispriority :?:
greetings by OHR
Jimmy

k-insis
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#7 Post by k-insis »

Got any numbers?

Could you run ( attached old sample 1000x sle) and post old and new numbers, please?

If indeed, they did something was due for long time.
Wolfgang Ciriack wrote: Mon Dec 12, 2022 11:44 am With version 2.00.1689 all gui dialogs are opening 2 - 4.5 times faster ! :clap:
Attachments
SLE1000.ZIP
(802 Bytes) Downloaded 552 times

User avatar
Tom
Posts: 1205
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#8 Post by Tom »

which "Base Priority" does Build 1689 show in Taskmanager -> Details -> Basispriority
Normal, as before.
Could you run ( attached old sample 1000x sle) and post old and new numbers, please?
No, but I have a similar functionality build into my apps. One part of it creates a dialog with 250 SLEs and deletes it four times. On a (not very fast) machine with Windows 11, this used to take around 15 seconds*, now it's 6.19 seconds:
leistungsmessung.png
leistungsmessung.png (57.39 KiB) Viewed 9204 times
Correction: With older versions of Xbase++ 2.0 or even with 1.9SL1, it needs around 21 seconds.
Best regards,
Tom

"Did I offend you?"
"No."
"Okay, give me a second chance."

k-insis
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:07 am

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#9 Post by k-insis »

Thank you very much for information.
Tom wrote: Thu Dec 15, 2022 12:07 am
which "Base Priority" does Build 1689 show in Taskmanager -> Details -> Basispriority
Normal, as before.
Could you run ( attached old sample 1000x sle) and post old and new numbers, please?
No, but I have a similar functionality build into my apps. One part of it creates a dialog with 250 SLEs and deletes it four times. On a (not very fast) machine with Windows 11, this used to take around 15 seconds*, now it's 6.19 seconds:
leistungsmessung.png

Correction: With older versions of Xbase++ 2.0 or even with 1.9SL1, it needs around 21 seconds.

skiman
Posts: 1195
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:22 am
Location: Sijsele, Belgium
Contact:

Re: Build 1689: Alaska has done a good job

#10 Post by skiman »

Hi,

I finally had the time to test with 2.0. I have updated all my tools to the latest versions.

I have a speedtest in my application based on the sample with 1000 SLE's.
Windows 11 Professional 22H2.
i7-8564U CPU with 16 Gb. Ram.

Xbase++ 1.9 SL1: Create: 2.78 sec. Destroy: 2.47 sec.
Xbase++ 2.0: Create 0.59 sec. Destroy: 0.19 sec.

Makes my day. :-)
Best regards,

Chris.
www.aboservice.be

Post Reply