First programs under 2.0

[Eugene Lutsenko]

You need an update from Xb2.Net.

Wolfgang! Could you remind me of Boris Borzik's email?

[rdonnay]

You will have to rewrite these code snippets without xb2net

Yes, that is correct.

[Eugene Lutsenko]

So I'll do that. And another question. If I completely switch to 2.0, will everything work on w10 and w7?

[sdenjupol148]

Hi Eugene,

I have several different software packages at several different clients.
Everything is compiled under 2.0 and my clients have a mixture of Win7 and Win10 machines.
There are no issues; everything works great.

Bobby

[Eugene Lutsenko]

Thank you, SbDrakos, this pleases. Do you also get lists of ch files when compiling? I have never been able to compile a large system (Eidos) that I make for 2.0. Writes that there is no memory. And in 1.9, the same thing is compiled and there is enough memory. I can't make a project file for it. To do this, you need to find out which ch and lib are really necessary for it. I don't know where to get this information

[Auge_Ohr]

hi,

I have never been able to compile a large system (Eidos) that I make for 2.0. Writes that there is no memory. And in 1.9, the same thing is compiled and there is enough memory. I can't make a project file for it.

why do you think Xbase++ v2.x is "better" for your Code
Xbase++ will not compile a PRG with 100000 lines ...

To do this, you need to find out which ch and lib are really necessary for it. I don't know where to get this information

AFAIK, your Source must #include *.CH Files else you got "Warnings" when compile with /W

[Eugene Lutsenko]

I think 2.0 is better, because it is 10 years newer. Has Alaska done something valuable in 10 years? I hope this will work better under w10. You can also opt out of xb2net, which I can't update. I will make a project for the Eidos system. You just need to block the workbench, otherwise it keeps popping up for something else. The AFAIK command lets you know which ch files to include in the source code? How do I use it?

[Auge_Ohr]

hi,

it is not the Question if Xbase++ v2.x is better as Xbase++ v1.9x.
it was the Question if it "help" you with your Code

Xbase++ v2.x also will refuse to compile your Code with 100000 lines in 1 x PRG ... NO Compiler will do it

---

You just need to block the workbench, otherwise it keeps popping up for something else.
The AFAIK command lets you know which ch files to include in the source code? How do I use it?

you should learn to work in Workbench ...

compile ONE Module until you got not Warnings with /W
search for missing Constant under \INCLUDE to which *.CH it belong ( use TC or HBFM )

i have #include "DcDialog.CH" in each of those 795 *.PRG ... have fun

[rdonnay]

Your code will compile faster if you break it down into many smaller .PRG files instead of 1 or 2 large .PRG files.

[Eugene Lutsenko]

Thanks. I understand that. I already manage to make small programs in 2.0 under W10.